
iEye by h.andras_xms
There is a lot of bad press going around about Apple’s iPhone at the moment. People are upset for a couple of reasons.
Criticism was initially sparked a few weeks ago when the company dropped the iPhone’s price by $200. While alienated early adopters where appeased with a refund, the resentment harbored by others continued. As a result, one group is now suing Apple for “price discrimination, underselling, discrimination in rebates, deceptive actions, and other wrongdoings”.
On another front, Apple has resently released a software update for the iPhone which effectively bricks those devices which have been hacked to allow extra options. Many people are not happy about Apple’s disregard for the rights of the consumer. Some reviewers who originally love the iPhone are now going so far as to inform their readers to avoid buying the iPhone. Digital Copyright Canada has a good analogy of why these iPhone owners are so upset.
Here is the scenario. A home builder builds homes and puts their own locks on the door. They retain the keys, and do not give the keys to the new owners when the homes are sold. The builder, not the owner, then decides who can have keys and who can not — and the owner is not given a key.
Iama Liar, chief executive of the home builders association, has said the association wanted to maintain control over the homes to protect neighbourhoods and to make sure the home was not damaged.
Some owners decide to protect their own property rights and remove the lock added by the builder. In response, the builder does a few things depending on the number of modification made: in some cases it simply puts their own locks back on, in other cases is removes anything from the home that were added by the owner, and in other cases they burn the home to the ground.
Sounds ridiculous right?
While this scenario may seem far fetched, is is analogous to what Apple is currently doing with iPhones. (See: Altered iPhones freeze up, Apple Users Talking Class-Action Lawsuit Over iPhone Locking, Steve Jobs Girds for the Long iPhone War )
Apple sells the iPhone to customers in a way that they are locked down from being modified by their new owners. Some owners have exerted their basic property rights and unlocked these phones. Once their property has had the foreign lock removed, they can then choose whatever phone network they want (Including buying one and using it with a Rogers or Fido account in Canada), and to install and run software of their own choosing.
Apple is now distributing updated software through iTunes which will un-do these changes made by the owners. In some cases it simply re-locks the phone and removes any non-Apple software added by the owner. In some cases it will “Brick” the phone, making the phone entirely inoperable.
Anyone who has the most remote respect for tangible property rights should be up at arms about this. If Canadian law does not already make this practise illegal, the provincial and federal governments should come together to ensure that it becomes illegal. It is important that federal parliamentarians understand this issue given there has been interest to legally protect these digital locks applied to devices by other than their owners, giving a legal free ride for device manufacturers and others who circumvent the most basic of property rights for owners of IT devices.
Quote by Russell McOrmond at Digital Copyright Canada

Other companies are currently attempting to benefit from this discontent by running marketing campaigns highlighting their “open” and “free” phone polices. It’s incredible that a company such as Apple, with all is hype and rabid cult following, would decide to take actions against consumers this way. Perhaps they assume that this kind of press won’t hurt them after the initial backlash. Maybe they are right.
Update: Apple’s new firmware has been hacked again.
Recent Comments