Monthly Archive for October, 2007

Page 2 of 2

Photos of the Queen of the North Sinking

Queen 8
Photo cour­tesy of Gra­ham Clarke/Vancouver Board of Trade

Lights of the stricken ferry the Queen of the North after it ran aground on March 22, 2006

Queen 7
Photo cour­tesy of Gra­ham Clarke/Vancouver Board of Trade

Pas­sen­gers pre­pare to aban­don the Queen of the North after it ran aground on March 22, 2006

Queen 9
Photo cour­tesy of Gra­ham Clarke/Vancouver Board of Trade

Prepar­ing to deploy lifeboats aboard the stricken ferry Queen of the North after it ran aground on March 22, 2006

Queen 10
Photo cour­tesy of Gra­ham Clarke/Vancouver Board of Trade

Res­cued pas­sen­gers from the Queen of the North after it ran aground on March 22, 2006

Queen 2
Photo by Mark van Manen/Vancouver Sun

A giant oil slick near the water where the BC Ferry Queen of the North ran aground and sank at Gill Island on March 22, 2006.

These pho­tographs are from the Van­cou­ver Sun | Photo Gallery. More infor­ma­tion on the BC Fer­ries’ Queen of the North sink­ing on March 22, 2006 can be found here.

Update 1:  The TSB report on the Queen of the North’s sink­ing has been released.

iPhone in Canada by October

iPhone Canada by Jesus Diaz @ Gizmodo
iPhone Canada by Jesus Diaz @ Gizmodo

Accord­ing to wild rumors (and we do mean wild), Cana­dian “lux­ury retailer” Holt Ren­frew — the Barney’s of the Great White North — will begin car­ry­ing a Canuck ver­sion of the beloved iPhone in about two weeks, for the deli­ciously low price of $799. The rumor appar­ently emanates from an “insider source” at the com­pany, though the store’s reps won’t con­firm the news. If you believe the leaker, the retailer will carry an 8GB, GSM ver­sion of the phone (obvi­ously, as no other ver­sion exists), and it will arrive on store shelves in mid-October. Sure, this sounds entic­ing, but why would a depart­ment store which spe­cial­izes in high-end goods be the first the carry the iPhone, and where is the announce­ment (or even rum­blings of an announce­ment) from a car­rier in Canada?

We’ve had rumors like this in the past, and I’m not get­ting my hopes up quite yet. If Apple is going to con­tinue to brick unlocked iPhones, I’m not sure I even want the device to come to Canada.… alright maybe I do.

iPhone com­ing to Cana­dian retailer Holt Renfrew? — Engadget, orig­i­naly from Dig­i­tal Journal

For more dis­cus­sion see: Infi­nite Loop, BetaNews, Gad­getell, Giz­modo, and Mac­si­mum News

Update: Tod Maf­fin has shed a lit­tle more light on the cur­rent state of the iPhone in Canada. Unlike what some peo­ple have spec­u­lated, he says that Rodgers really does want to bring the iPhone to Canada (even with the unlim­ited data plan), how­ever, there are cur­rently two prob­lems bar­ring the way. For one, there is trade­mark dis­pute between Apple and ComWave (who owns the iPhone trade­mark in Canda). Maf­fin also says that the rumored 3G upgrades com­ing in 2008 have con­tributed to Canada’s miss­ing iPhones.

Update 2: Another rumor has sur­faced stat­ing that the iPhone may come to Canada on May21st, 2008. I’m try­ing not to get my hopes up (not that I could afford it anyways).

Apple Causes Problems for iPhone Users

iEye by h.andras_xms
iEye by h.andras_xms

There is a lot of bad press going around about Apple’s iPhone at the moment. Peo­ple are upset for a cou­ple of reasons.

Crit­i­cism was ini­tially sparked a few weeks ago when the com­pany dropped the iPhone’s price by $200. While alien­ated early adopters where appeased with a refund, the resent­ment har­bored by oth­ers con­tin­ued. As a result, one group is now suing Apple for “price dis­crim­i­na­tion, under­selling, dis­crim­i­na­tion in rebates, decep­tive actions, and other wrong­do­ings”.

On another front, Apple has resently released a soft­ware update for the iPhone which effec­tively bricks those devices which have been hacked to allow extra options. Many peo­ple are not happy about Apple’s dis­re­gard for the rights of the con­sumer. Some review­ers who orig­i­nally love the iPhone are now going so far as to inform their read­ers to avoid buy­ing the iPhone. Dig­i­tal Copy­right Canada has a good anal­ogy of why these iPhone own­ers are so upset.

Here is the sce­nario. A home builder builds homes and puts their own locks on the door. They retain the keys, and do not give the keys to the new own­ers when the homes are sold. The builder, not the owner, then decides who can have keys and who can not — and the owner is not given a key.

Iama Liar, chief exec­u­tive of the home builders asso­ci­a­tion, has said the asso­ci­a­tion wanted to main­tain con­trol over the homes to pro­tect neigh­bour­hoods and to make sure the home was not damaged.

Some own­ers decide to pro­tect their own prop­erty rights and remove the lock added by the builder. In response, the builder does a few things depend­ing on the num­ber of mod­i­fi­ca­tion made: in some cases it sim­ply puts their own locks back on, in other cases is removes any­thing from the home that were added by the owner, and in other cases they burn the home to the ground.

Sounds ridicu­lous right?

While this sce­nario may seem far fetched, is is anal­o­gous to what Apple is cur­rently doing with iPhones. (See: Altered iPhones freeze up, Apple Users Talk­ing Class-Action Law­suit Over iPhone Lock­ing, Steve Jobs Girds for the Long iPhone War )

Apple sells the iPhone to cus­tomers in a way that they are locked down from being mod­i­fied by their new own­ers. Some own­ers have exerted their basic prop­erty rights and unlocked these phones. Once their prop­erty has had the for­eign lock removed, they can then choose what­ever phone net­work they want (Includ­ing buy­ing one and using it with a Rogers or Fido account in Canada), and to install and run soft­ware of their own choosing.

Apple is now dis­trib­ut­ing updated soft­ware through iTunes which will un-do these changes made by the own­ers. In some cases it sim­ply re-locks the phone and removes any non-Apple soft­ware added by the owner. In some cases it will “Brick” the phone, mak­ing the phone entirely inoperable.

Any­one who has the most remote respect for tan­gi­ble prop­erty rights should be up at arms about this. If Cana­dian law does not already make this prac­tise ille­gal, the provin­cial and fed­eral gov­ern­ments should come together to ensure that it becomes ille­gal. It is impor­tant that fed­eral par­lia­men­tar­i­ans under­stand this issue given there has been inter­est to legally pro­tect these dig­i­tal locks applied to devices by other than their own­ers, giv­ing a legal free ride for device man­u­fac­tur­ers and oth­ers who cir­cum­vent the most basic of prop­erty rights for own­ers of IT devices.

Quote by Rus­sell McOr­mond at Dig­i­tal Copy­right Canada

Nokia Ad

Other com­pa­nies are cur­rently attempt­ing to ben­e­fit from this dis­con­tent by run­ning mar­ket­ing cam­paigns high­light­ing their “open” and “free” phone polices. It’s incred­i­ble that a com­pany such as Apple, with all is hype and rabid cult fol­low­ing, would decide to take actions against con­sumers this way. Per­haps they assume that this kind of press won’t hurt them after the ini­tial back­lash. Maybe they are right.

Update: Apple’s new firmware has been hacked again.

Superman Coat Hanger

For those closet Clark Kents out there…

Superman Coat Hanger

Why didn’t we ever see this on Sein­feld?

Comu­nistar Design­ers — Hanger — Super via Boing Boing